If absolutely all you have to sell is coal, and no othe rway to buy
food, then yes.

I am not saying the argument makes sense from a detailed economic
study of the Iranian economy, just passing it along.

On 4/20/06, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So we have it wrong. Instead of burning coal and having the lowest energy
> costs in the country, we in Kentucky should be selling the coal and spending
> more money on nuclear energy.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:204916
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to