I don't see it as unreasonable, but for a counterpoint, see Chris Hitchens' comments here:
http://www.radioblogger.com/#001552 Here's an excerpt: "By the way, I can't say that I think that Mr. Bush at his worst is as bad as President Clinton was. That's eight years down the American drain right there. The first eight, those post-Cold War years, thrown away by a narcissist and a crook. For the nomination of worst ever president, I can't, I really, though I have many, many quarrels with President Bush, I cannot believe that people would say he was worse than Mr. Nixon or Mr. Carter, just to stay in modern times...or Kennedy." On 4/24/06, Ian Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Some interesting speculation. > > > http://rollingstone.com/news/profile/story/9961300/the_worst_president_in_history?rnd=1145891049484&has-player=true&version=6.0.12.1465 > > I found this a fairly reasonable interpretation. I'm sure others will see > it as unfounded Bush bashing. > > -- --------------- Robert Munn www.funkymojo.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:205342 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
