Wow man, sensationalism from Gelly, and amazing twist on the facts. 1. This doesn't change the US's position on internet neutrality one iota, the coalition wants something legal saying it will remain neutral.
2. The bill is troubling however. It looks like they are going to do what they did with AT&T and the baby bells all over again, and that shit didn't work then, why do they think it will work now? Gel, man, seriously, do you even read what you post? -- Timothy Heald Analyst, Architect, Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: 202-228-8372 C: 703-300-3911 -----Original Message----- From: Vivec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 6:40 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: US threatening Net Neutrality http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1953085,00.asp On 4/25/06, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could you link to the original story please? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:205459 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
