Here's one: http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/06/10/fallen_star_blames_self_gop_tactics/
I'm sure there are others... --- On Monday, June 12, 2006 8:30 PM, deadcityskin scribed: --- > > What was the law that was broken in order to give Bush the win? > > See that's where your argument breaks down. > > Do you really think that the democrats wouldn't have grabbed onto > something with which to impeach this monkey by now? > > I'm not saying you shouldn't say what you believe, or trying to > attack you, I'm sorry about calling you a lefty loon. > > Listen, answer that question and win a convert to your cause right > here and now. > > I'll be on a corner with impeach bush signs and put up a web site for > it and everything. > > What law was broken to put Bush in office? > > Again, this is just questioning the facts as you have put them > forward. > > You said he was NEVER legally elected. > > Are you also calling into doubt the second election? > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Maureen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 2:20 PM >> To: CF-Community >> Subject: Re: Is Coulter somehow related to Robertson? >> >> >> Facts are what really happened, not some poltician or writer's spin >> on what happened. Several list members here, when asked for facts or >> empirical evidence, will invariably attack the messanger instead of >> the message. Calling me a left-wing loon adds nothing to the >> argument, but instead mimics the tactics of those whose only >> methodology is to besmirch anyone who disagrees with them. I try, >> and I may not alway to succeed, to never make my replies a personal >> attack. Even with Sam, who I long ago decided is only ever going to >> parrot the right-wing spin, I try not to attack him, only to point >> out the fallacies in his posts. >> >> As for your statements below, Moore and Rush may both be liars. I >> have such an avoidance of the commentary of both the left and right, >> I have not exposed myself to specific instances, hence my request for >> links to any evidence of such. >> >> I am well aware that Iraq and Afghanistan are different wars, however >> my personal view, which I always label as such, is that they are both >> being fought more for greed that for any real attemp to make us more >> secure. That is probably because I am more afraid of a government >> with will spy on and imprison their citizens for thought crimes than >> I am of a terrorist bomb. >> >> As for the elections, we obviously have different definitions of >> winning. I will never acknowledge Bush as a legally elected >> president, although I recognize that due to the actions of the >> Supreme court, and the Florida and Ohio election commissions, he >> holds the office. >> >> But I don't like it, and I never will, As a citizen of this great >> country, I feel that it is not only my right, but my duty to speak >> out against what I perceive as a grave wrong. So I'll continue to >> speak, until the minions duct tape my mouth shut and pitch me in >> cell. >> >> >> >> On 6/12/06, John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> What facts are those? >>> >>> I hate this same fight I have, no matter people's personal >> politics; they >>> never want to admit that their opinions are slanted by their >>> personal beliefs. >>> >>> Michael Moore is a bloated liar. >>> Rush Limbaugh is a bloated liar. >>> Bush won not one, but two elections. >>> Iraq and Afghanistan are two different wars. >>> >>> Seriously. Sam will hem and haw about Limbaugh and Coulter, >> then Maureen or >>> Dana will defend someone like Churchill or Moore. They are all >>> tools. >>> >>> You know why no one is happy with our government? Because all >> government >>> sucks ass. That's why. However we as humans can not live and >> be productive >>> without some structure to stop us from stealing and killing to >> get ahead. >>> >>> That's why I support LIMITED government. >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Maureen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 2:41 PM >>>> To: CF-Community >>>> Subject: Re: Is Coulter somehow related to Robertson? >>>> >>>> I don't know that I would define myself as far left. I'm more of a >>>> radical, in that I hate all politicians, left and right. I don't >>>> despise Bush for being a neo-con, I despise him for what he and >>>> his minions are doing to demantle this underpinings of this country >>>> because I think their actions do more damage to our freedoms and >>>> rights then any action by external terrorists. >>>> >>>> I am not just opposed to the war in Iraq, I am opposed to all >>>> war, but I recognize the necessity to stop war-mongers on either >>>> side, and that it sometimes requires violence. However, I am >>>> appalled at the way they used 9/11 to further their greedy >>>> ambition and enrich their corporate supporters, and absolutely >>>> horrified at their murder of innocents in the name of "spreading >>>> democracy". And by innocents, I mean the people of various >>>> countries, notably women and children who have died in the >>>> bombings and raids. >>>> >>>> Labels mean nothing. You can paint me with whatever brush you >>>> desire. I don't care. It only shows your inability to effectively >>>> challenge me on the facts of the issues. >>>> >>>> >>>> On 6/12/06, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> She's always been a far left loon job, but at least she admits it. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:208995 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
