The company was all ready deep in the red when Bush signed on. He used Enron style bookkeeping practice to hide the debt, except he did it to save the company not to steal the money. He used his connections at Harvard, where he'd just graduated. Harvard bailed out the company and made a return on there investment. If you want to claim Harvard helped to get close to the president, I don't see why but it still has nothing to do with this thread. Using his influence and system loopholes to save a near bankrupt company is not the same as bankrupting four companies.
On 6/20/06, Dana Tierney wrote: > why? I only have a few minutes and don't have time to parse the differences. > What's your point, Sam? > > > > I like this one better: > > http://foi.missouri.edu/usenergypolicies/harvardharkenwsj.html > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:209804 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
