Thanks. --- On Thursday, June 29, 2006 11:57 PM, Sam scribed: --- > > My quick and personal view, from reading the second paragraph: > "...Justice John Paul Stevens, who said the proposed trials were > illegal under U.S. law and international Geneva conventions." was that > all terrorist will now be treated like American citizens. This is not > good since the terrorist have no laws to follow. > > Then I heard this on Rush: > > "Today's Supreme Court decision reaffirms the American ideal that all > are entitled to the basic guarantees of our justice system. This is a > triumph for the rule of law. The rights of due process are among our > most cherished liberties, and today's decision is a rebuke of the Bush > Administration's detainee policies and a reminder of our > responsibility to protect both the American people and our > Constitutional rights. We cannot allow the values on which our country > was founded to become a casualty in the war on terrorism." - Nancy > Pelosi > > This tells me our laws protect terrorist anywhere in the world that > are trying to kill us. > And she's ok with that. A photo goes with it:) > http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/today.ParTop.0002.ImageFile.gif > > Then I read the Mark Levin piece: > http://levin.nationalreview.com/ > > I have a lot of trust in Mr. Levin's opinions when it comes to the > judicial branch, since it's one of my many weak points. But I like to > stay open minded and would love to here opposing views. >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:210533 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
