They would get killed. It's happened before, and will probably happen again.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Casey Dougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 2:30 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Is there a Double Standard in the treatment of Isreal vs > anyone else > > I've been having troubles understanding the whole thing here. I was never > any good at social studies. This definition of Israel has helped me > understand what they are attempting to gain back after centuries of > torture > from the powers around them... > > http://encyclopedia.laborlawtalk.com/Israeli > > My thoughts are, the UN should just declared Israel an "World Monument" > and > called it a day. Too many groups claim this as part of their heritage to > give in to the other. > > I could just imagine what would happen if all the Indians got together and > said they want their native lands back. > > casey > > On 7/14/06, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Of course there's a double standard and I can point it out for days. > Thing > > is, it does not matter as people just want to accept it. > > Israel has a barrier (wall and fence) for security that has been > condemned > > by the UN. Egypt has a wall, Spain has a wall, Saudi Arabia has a wall, > and > > on and on. All to prevent illegal immigration. Israel has a wall for > that > > and security but it's bad for them to have one. > > > > If someone shot a missile across the boarder into America or ANY other > > country, it would result in a military action at the minimum and a war > at > > the max. This happens to Israel every single day but they're expected to > > just suck it up. The media excuse? The missiles are inaccurate, low > yield, > > hand made, have only caused a few deaths, etc. > > > > Have I mentioned that the media sucks. They lie and lie more to make > > people believe and pay for a service that they are being lied about > anyway. > > > > The list goes on and on but the point is still moot. Israel will never > get > > a fair break at the UN or anywhere else (the new human rights council > has > > one single agenda every time they meet, to condemn Israel. really. look > it > > up.) > > > > >So, does anyone else feel that maybe, just maybe, Michael has some > > >justification to his feelings on this subject. > > > > > >I can see from news reports that Israel is not attacking populated > > >areas, is warning people to leave when it does (with plenty of time to > > >get out, even for the bad guys), and is concentrating on military > > >targets. They are trying very hard to limit civilian casualties. > > > > > >Hezbollah is targeting nothing but civilian population centers. > > > > > >Yet there is nothing I am seeing, either from the media, or from the > > >world leadership, that is mentioning this dichotomy. > > > > > >Is it just (as I have thought before) that we expect better behavior > > >from "civilized" countries like Israel, and we know that Hezbollah is > > >NOT civilized, and so expect nothing different, or is it that we judge > > >Israel different than the countries and people around it? > > > > > >Truly curious. > > >Jerry > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:5/messageid:211211 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
