well then, that position, as stated by you, is rather silly. No point in arguing it if nobody is defnding it.
>> Dana wrote: >> However, your position leads to the contention that all ova have a right to >> be born > >It's not my position, it's just a position that I am clarifying so >that I can understand the issues. And that position would say that >all embryos (i.e., *fertilized* eggs), not all ova, are human life. > >As for conflicting rights, that positon would say this: > >If a woman knowingly gives up eggs for fertilization then she is >responsible for those fertilized eggs. The same is true for a man. >Again, there's no logical difference between fertilization in the womb >and in the test tube. If she knowingly fertilizes an egg she has no >intention of bringing to term, then she's negligent at a minimum. > >Further, if someone uses eggs, unknown to the mother, to create a >fertilized egg then they are responsible for bringing the embryo to >term. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:5/messageid:211719 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
