> Dana wrote: > based on child support enforcement alone. But what is "child support enforcement"? It sounds like some type of liberal do-gooder government program that I would definitely hate.
> but there's little point in arguing with words you've put in his mouth. > I'm just repeating what I heard his Chief of Staff say on Meet The Press. Again: it's a good consistent argument. Yours isn't. QED. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:211728 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
