On 7/28/06, Gruss Gott wrote:

> But this is all a "he started it" argument.  Are you right?  Yes.
> Does it matter who started it? No.  Is Israel defending itself?
> Theoretically yes, practically no.
>
> All Israel is doing is destroying assets that their allies, the
> Lebanese, owned and were using.  And if that's what you call
> "defending themselves" then they will do that until they run out of
> bombs.  And then Iran will send Hezbollah (who ranks are swelled by
> pissed Lebanese) will more rockets, if not troops, and then the real
> fun will start.
>
> Every day brings the world 10 steps closer to a religious war and
> those cannot be won.  The only good outcome for both Israel and
> Lebanon is to have the US broker a deal.
>
> This has all been done before and proven in Northern Ireland.
>

What he said:

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ideas_opinions/story/438582p-369513c.html
Let Israel win the war - Charles Krauthammer

In fight vs. Hezbollah, it's wrong to expect restraint

What other country, when attacked in an unprovoked aggression across a
recognized international frontier, is then put on a countdown clock by
the world and given a limited time window in which to fight back,
regardless of whether it has restored its own security?
What other country sustains 1,500 indiscriminate rocket attacks into
its cities - every one designed to kill, maim and terrorize civilians
- and is then vilified by the world when it tries to destroy the
enemy's infrastructure and strongholds with precision-guided munitions
that sometimes have the unintended but unavoidable consequence of
collateral civilian death and suffering?

Hearing the world pass judgment on the Israel-Hezbollah war as it
unfolds is to live in an Orwellian moral universe. With a few
significant exceptions (the leadership of the United States, Britain,
Australia, Canada and a very few others), the world - governments, the
media, UN bureaucrats - has completely lost its moral bearings.

The word that obviates all thinking and magically inverts victim into
aggressor is "disproportionate," as in the universally decried
"disproportionate Israeli response."

When the United States was attacked at Pearl Harbor, it did not
respond with a parallel "proportionate" attack on a Japanese naval
base. It launched a four-year campaign that killed millions of
Japanese, reduced Tokyo, Hiroshima and Nagasaki to cinders, and turned
the Japanese home islands to rubble and ruin. Disproportionate? No.

When one is wantonly attacked by an aggressor, one has every right -
legal and moral - to carry the fight until the aggressor is disarmed
and so disabled that it cannot threaten one's security again. That's
what it took with Japan.

Britain was never invaded by Germany in World War II. Did Britain
respond to the blitz and V-1 and V-2 rockets with "proportionate"
aerial bombardment of Germany? Of course not. British Prime Minister
Winston Churchill orchestrated the greatest land invasion in history
that flattened and utterly destroyed Germany, killing untold innocent
German women and children in the process.

The perversity of today's international outcry lies in the fact that
there is indeed a disproportion in this war, a radical moral asymmetry
between Hezbollah and Israel: Hezbollah is deliberately trying to
create civilian casualties on both sides while Israel is deliberately
trying to minimize civilian casualties, also on both sides.

In perhaps the most blatant terror campaign from the air since the
London blitz, Hezbollah is raining rockets on Israeli cities and
villages. The rockets are packed with ball bearings that can penetrate
automobiles and shred human flesh. They are meant to kill and maim.
And they do.

But it is a dual campaign. Israeli innocents must die in order for
Israel to be terrorized. But Lebanese innocents also must die in order
for Israel to be demonized, which is why Hezbollah hides its fighters,
its rockets, its launchers, its entire infrastructure among civilians.
Creating human shields is a war crime. It is also a Hezbollah
specialty.

On Wednesday, CNN cameras showed destruction in Tyre. What does Israel
have against Tyre? Nothing. But the long-range Hezbollah rockets that
have been raining terror on Haifa are based in Tyre. What is Israel to
do?

Had Israel wanted to destroy Lebanese civilian infrastructure, it
would have turned out the lights in Beirut in the first hour of the
war, destroying the billion-dollar power grid and setting back Lebanon
20 years. It did not do that. Instead, it attacked dual-use
infrastructure - bridges, roads, airport runways - and blockaded
Lebanon's ports to prevent the reinforcement and resupply of
Hezbollah. Ten thousand Katyusha rockets are enough. Israel was not
going to allow Hezbollah 10,000 more.

Israel's response to Hezbollah has been to use the most precise
weaponry and targeting it can. It has no interest, no desire to kill
Lebanese civilians. Does anyone imagine that it could not have leveled
south Lebanon, to say nothing of Beirut? Instead, in the bitter fight
against Hezbollah in south Lebanon, it has repeatedly dropped
leaflets, issued warnings, sent messages by radio and even phone text
to Lebanese villagers to evacuate so that they would not be harmed.

Israel knows that these leaflets and warnings give the Hezbollah
fighters time to escape and regroup. The advance notification as to
where the next attack is coming has allowed Hezbollah to set up
elaborate ambushes. The result? Unexpectedly high Israeli infantry
casualties. Moral scrupulousness paid in blood. Israeli soldiers die
so that Lebanese civilians will not, and who does the international
community condemn for disregarding civilian life?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:212003
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to