I don't watch it because I don't watch television.  Your other sources are
great if a bit business-oriented. I betcha you're in favor of drilling in
ANWR hmm?

it looks to me like we are dealing with a lot of different definitions of
"objective" -- unless they are all "agrees with my preconceptions'? I am
just thinking out loudhere and including myself in all this so I hope nobody
out there is taking offense.

Dana


On 8/2/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Nick wrote:
> > In depth investigative reporting costs money, and I'd bet many are
> worried
> > about lawsuits and other negative backlashes, look at the documents Dan
> > Rather reported on.
> >
>
> Does nobody watch The Newshour?  The perfect fact-based news program
> is already here and The Newshour is it.  In-depth reporting AND
> commentary by experts in their field not pundits.  Although every
> Friday they have 2 pundits for 5 minutes or so.  I think it gets
> higher ratings than the 3 network news programs combined.
>
> The there's The Economist and The Financial Times with basically the
> same thing.  A bit less so with The WSJ.
>
> So the real question is where do people get the majority of their
> news?  There are plenty of good sources out there.
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:212287
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to