> Dana wrote: > I betcha you're in favor of drilling in > ANWR hmm? >
I've yet to see any good arguments for or against. If it's for more oil, it seems to be not enough to make much of a difference so why pull that trigger now? If the against is because it'll scare the caribou ... well that's just stupid. > it looks to me like we are dealing with a lot of different definitions of > "objective" -- Nobody and nothing is objective which is why you do it like the Newshour does. You get experts, not pundits but people who are esteemed in their field, to comment on issues. Ideally you get 2 or 3 for and 2 or 3 against and then ask them tough questions. As for the reporting you get expert reporters who are on the scene and are independent. This is the whole purpose behind Public Television and why it should be supported. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:212296 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
