1. We aren't talking about a local police response we are talking about a military action, two very different things.
2. Our Rules of engagement say that if a gunman is firing from a crowd, and the crowd does not disperse, we return fire. The civilians become the equivalent of sand bags, and Gellie this is supported by the Geneva convention and international law. > -----Original Message----- > From: G Money [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 10:48 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Interview with Benjamin Netanyahu > > Depends. > > If the crowd decided to protect and support the murderer.....allowing the > murder to hide amongst them in anonymity, coming out to murder at will > then > slinking back to hide in the crowd. That would certainly change the > circumstances, wouldn't it? > > On 8/4/06, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Mature and responsible nations function in ways that are readily > > differentiated from terrorist organisations. > > > > International law is not that much different from civil law in this > > instance from what is expected. > > > > You would not allow a Policeman to fire into a crowd to hit a fleeing > > murderer. > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:212551 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
