Unphuckingbelievable. You are defending a journalists' staging, doctoring, or outright faking their photographs...as long as they have a good story to tell?
Your bias is showing. If this had been a faked photograph of some Iraqi kid hugging a US soldier, or some staged sort of pro-American propaganda...you'd be shitting kittens right now. As it is...you seem to be fine with it. And to address your specific....though weak...point: if the story is dead civilians, and there are all these thousands of dead civilians strewn about the place....why not take a picture of THEM, instead of faking one? On 8/10/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > gMoney wrote: > > You serious? > > > > It DOES materially change the story. Especially having that one guy lay > down > > and pretend to be injured!!!! I mean....geeeesh. > > > > How? The story is dead civilians. Whether that guy is dead or not > and a civilian or not doesn't change the fact that there are dead > civilians. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:212889 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
