> gMoney wrote: > You are defending a journalists' staging, doctoring, or outright faking > their photographs...as long as they have a good story to tell? > > Your bias is showing.
Your lack of science training is showing. My "bias" is for facts, not for conjecture, supposition, and faulty analysis. I'm not defending anyone or anything, I'm pointing out the facts and therefore implicit errors in your analysis. If you consider facts to be a bias then you're living in the right state. The facts are: 1.) We have no idea if this was staged. 2.) If it was staged we have no idea what the motivation was. 3.) Even if was staged to fool media customers (your factless assumption and worst case scenario), it doesn't change the material point of the story: civilians are dying. In summary this photo is proof of nothing. It's one data point that may or may not indicate a trend. But a trend one data point does not make. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:212895 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
