Lets assume that the blog is not reliable. All we have to do is check their data to judge for ourselves. Is the guy alive in the first shots? Yes. If he shown laying down with his hat between his arm and body? Yes. Does the caption totally imply that he's a dead body? I'd say so. But the point is moot as the NYTimes just had to say "whoops, we really meant he was hurt while helping" which absolves the editor who approved it of any responsibility.
Oh, on questioning the reliability of the blog, they did update it with all of the responses and additional information. That says responsible to me. As opposed to many media outlets who refuse or don't bother to do retractions. > ok, I realize that you guys have already been at this for a couple of > days, > but how reliable is the blog, first of all? > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:212975 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
