On 8/15/06, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But Hatton, there are several of us here saying that this does not > correspond to our experience. Granted a non-jew like me is a little less > likely to notice the less blatant stuff, in the same way as whites are more > likely to consider discrimination against blacks to be be an issue, but it > *still* seems wierd to me, especially in the Guardian. I'd be more likely to > expect that sort of think out of a tabloid like the Sun.
Tulia's in the Panhandle, not down by Dallas... same concept though. Any form of descriminaton, be it anti-semetic (or anti-Jewish), racist, sexist, homophobia can be tough to see if you're not a part of that group of people. The issue at point is the fact that Guardian and other media outlets are putting more press and more publicity on the fringe and outrageous groups than the sane ones. Specifically in the case of the Guardian (go to http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/index.html ) they are putting the Guardian name on the opinion pages and rating and ranking them. There is one side note on this point... I finally scrolled top to bottom and found the source of the title of their online editorials - "Comment is free" It's a quote, in it's entirety reads, "Comment is free but facts are sacred" attributed to CP Scott, 1921 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:213239 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
