On 8/17/06, Dana wrote: > call me wonkette :) Damn Wankers!
> It's pretty impenetrable, but he seems to be saying that her decision in > this case should be dismissed because she was biased in a completely > different case and in that case, she manipulated the system to support her > bias. Not dismissed, expected. > This is quite apart from the fact that she is disqualified on the basis of > being a babe and a Stalinist ;) He never said or implied being a babe is a disqualification. Stalinist yes. > I'm tempted to say so what if she flipped a coin or assassinated the chief > justice, *it's a completely different case*, but I am sure this would not be > seen as questioning the relevance of the argument, but as a vote in favor of > manipulating the system when it's convenient. It says she's activist judge, one who changes laws to fit her beliefs rather than interpreting the laws that exist. > Let us pause for a moment to admire the audacity of Rush or any member of > the Bush administration complaining about an alleged manipulation of the > system. So you're defending her action as "fair play to her". True colors. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:213502 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
