hmmm.... I am listening to the second one right now. Which source is "bad"... NIST, the MIT engineering professor, the fire marshal or the demolitions expert?
It's not something I want to believe but these people don't strike me as nut jobs. I have been listening to the audio while doing something else and am going to have to go offline without hearing the end of it, so I have no opinion on it at the moment, except that the usual neocon tactic blethering about foil hats is not going to wash. If I found out that the alleged MIT professor is not I might think otherwise, but he damn sure sounds like my old physics professor.... Dana On 8/21/06, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I love it how people can create things like this, leave out stuff they want > to, make up information, and use sources that are just as bad as they are > and present it as fact. > > I love the interwebs, everything there is true, and sense its on Google > Video is must be true. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Andrew Grosset [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2006 10:37 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Loose Change > > > > Whether you believe in a 9/11 conspiracy or not you should watch this > > video, > > Loose Change Second edition: > > > > http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5946593973848835726 > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:213767 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
