I hear Popular Mechanics did a good job debunking all the conspiracies. I haven't read: http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html
On 8/22/06, Nick McClure wrote: > Well, only if the frame of the building held. Everything I've read and seen > claims that the Tower only had an external frame, there was no internal > frame, and the collapse occurred because the center of the building couldn't > withstand the forces above it because of the loss of the structural > integrity, which caused the building to collapse from the center, and the > force of the collapse of the center brought the steel frame down. > > I'm not a structural engineer but that makes sense to me. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:213923 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
