Which in turn means it's false....which means the argument is indeed nonsense...and MT's original post was justified.
On 8/22/06, Zaphod Beeblebrox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > uhmmm...yes, that's it in a nutshell. > > On 8/21/06, Cameron Childress <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So to summarize, Andrew thinks the argument presented in the video is > > just as valid as the one used by the Bush administration to promote > > the war in Iraq. > > > > Nice logic. > > > > -Cameron > > > > On 8/21/06, Zaphod Beeblebrox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ha! that's true. Good comparison. > > > > > > > > > On 8/21/06, Andrew Grosset <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >I love it how people can create things like this, leave out stuff > they want > > > > >to, make up information, and use sources that are just as bad as > they are > > > > >and present it as fact. > > > > > > > > That sounds like an excellent description of the Bush > Administration!!...remember the reasons for starting a war with Iraq? > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:213822 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
