That argument is specious at best, because without the WMDs there is no rationale for the rest, with the exception of "secure Iraq's oil fields and other resources" which if they were honest was the pure and simple root of the entire war. They wanted the oil.
Self-defense? If they don't have weapons what are we defending against? On 8/22/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.theconservativevoice.com/article/17455.html > > On 8/22/06, Maureen wrote: > > He also said they had no WMDs. So my question to him would be "why > > are we there?" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:213875 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
