>I think that all of you all that are arguing the proposition need to >go see what the movie says about your arguments, which it does >address. I don't have time just now to relay the arguments, especially >since I haven't finished watching it myself. If you still think the >movie is wrong after that, fine. But none of you have watched it and >you're arguing that it is wrong with someone who has listened to half >of it. You are probably right that it's a half-baked theory, but all >of you are currently arguing beside the point. > >Dana > >On 8/23/06, Russel Madere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>
Well said. Andrew ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:214103 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
