Sorry, maybe it wasn't Time. The story is based on a book by Michael Isikoff and David Corn:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14533384/site/newsweek/ As to whether Fitzgerald knew, here is a quote from the article: "Armitage himself was aggressively investigated by special counsel Patrick Fitzgerald, but was never charged. Fitzgerald found no evidence that Armitage knew of Plame's covert CIA status when he talked to Novak and Woodward." He knew but never charged Armitage. So why the case against Libby? It looks increasingly like a witchunt. I hope they kill this notion of special prosecutor cases- they always turn into witchunts. On 8/29/06, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > conspiracies are news, inadvertent leaks are boring. > > true. but you really can't blame the press for running with the > consiracy in this case. Nobody who knew was coming forward with the > truth, eh? > > Also, does it really follow that because Justice knew that the Special > Prosecutor did too (didn't read the article...no link)? > > -- > will > > "If my life weren't funny, it would just be true; > and that would just be unacceptable." > - Carrie Fisher > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:214411 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
