> gMoney wrote: > It's also directly because people are basically dipshits. >
This weekend on Meet The Press Cheney said something to the effect of "we are much more secure than if Saddam was in power" Huh? How can that be given what we know now: 1.) Iraq had no WMD. 2.) Iraq had no link with Al Quaeda. 3.) Iraq was possibly an ally against some Al Queada forces. >From a purely US perspective Iraq has been nothing but a money suck and the gov't that's been created is openly supporting Hezbollah. Hell, they're only one step away from being Al Quaeda supporters. And that's cost us $300 million, 2,500 American lives, 25,000 Americans wounded, and 50,000 Iraqi dead. So that we can build a Hezbollah supporter??? Some of the counter points I've heard are that Iraq WAS pursuing nukes. So the feck what? Iran is too. And NK possibly already has them. >From a purely American perspective how has the invasion of Iraq benefited us at all? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:215129 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
