> gMoney wrote: > It's only a double standard to the people who let Moore get away with his > bullshit. I never did. Both are demonstrably fictitious in parts, or twist > contexts to convey a message totally different than the original event. >
There's a big difference: Moore's film was shot documentary style - he was showing actual facts. You can argue that he arranged them to make a point, but what he showed were facts. (yes, yes, I've seen all of the disputes and never seen any worth any amount of time) This is a re-creation with actors that purports to be a *historical* recreation when it's not. Moore's was an arrangement of facts (thus no disclaimers), this is fraud. (btw - I in no way endorse nor support Moore or his film, just making the point) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:215157 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
