> Sam wrote: > If that were the case I would have said: "human-animal weddings" > The Namba issue is a real issue that I thought all liberals, > especially elitist ones, supported for the civil liberties aspect
Anytime you finding statements like "all liberals believe ..." you should remember that that is an ignorant and small thing to say. That having been said, you do have good point mixed in with your stereotyping: what about the publication of descriptions of illegal acts? This is tricky case. My socially liberal mind tends to think this must be controlled if not illegal on a case-by-case basis. For example - with the nambla issue, that should be banned as that information serves no useful legal purpose. That being said you can apply the guns-kill-people argument to it. With bomb making, that should be controlled but not illegal. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:215880 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
