> Sam wrote: > Arguing without facts sucks too. Are you still getting your news from the WSJ? >
So 99% of everything you posted is the typical one-sided-lie-of-omission-make-up-lies-with-kernels-of-truth type propaganda that misled this country into a war of choice that's making the terrorism problem worse. My position on it is that we're all to blame: Clinton, Bush, Congress, and the US citizens. Life was so good under Pres Clinton that we actually spent $400 million to find out the President's sex life. That was our big worry. We were all asleep at the wheel and we all deserve blame. The more important question is what are doing now. The most important answer is squandering $1 trillion on a war of choice that's making worse the factors that caused us to be attacked in the first place not to mention draining our ability to fight. So, the crystal clear facts are that President Bush's "war on terror" has been an firm and total failure and we need new leadership that works with facts rather than faith. And that's why, despite the fact that I cringe to vote for my local Democrat candidate for the Senate, I'm going too. It's time for new leadership and Bush has fecked things up so bad that the yeah-but-they'll-suck-worse argument can't possibly be true. You can't feck things up worse than Bush has. This is the foreign policy bottom. Welcome! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:216142 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
