Then they shouldn't have signed the permission form, no? And it's not nudity, it's /art/. It's sad that you cannot discern one from the other, IMO. Seriously. You're doing your child a disservice by making a big deal out of it being nudity. Because once you do that, it becomes pron in their eyes, and ceases to be art.
> -----Original Message----- > From: C. Hatton Humphrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 12:35 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Fear of religious fanatics > > > Why _would_ a "Christian parent" need to raise concerns? > > > > And indeed, what concerns are those? That a ten year old would see a > > nude statue/painting/sculpture? > > As a parent it is my responsibility to raise my children with my > morals and to my standards. Is 10 years old too young to be exposed > to nudity? How about sexual intercourse? How about drug use? How > about animal slaughter? > > The parents that complained were upset that their children were > exposed to nudity. It is their right as parents to not want their 10 > year old exposed to nudity. This is not a "nutty" concept, not in my > eyes. Not in the eyes of most of the people that I've talked to about > this issue. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:216208 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
