I think you're actually answering Gruss' point that you might not be able to prove your citizenship. I'll let him answer this. Me, I am answering Jeff's notion that the problem is that the prisoners' country of origin does not have a Constitution. Let me add to this answer by pointing out that the kid mentioned in the first article is a Canadian citizen. Canada does have a Constitution.
Dana > How is it hard? You been in prison before and were unable to prove > it? > > ________________________________ > > From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sun 10/15/2006 2:38 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Republicans Suspend Habeas Corpus > > > > ha. Please explain to me how the constitution of other countries > affects the behavior of the United States government. For instance, at > least one of the detainees is Australian, and Australia has a > Constitution. A quick Google indicates that there's at least one > Briton, and while Britain does not have a written constitution > precisely, the Magna Carta embodies most of the same principles as the > American Constitution, which was derived from it. > > So your argument is specious at best. > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:217510 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
