International Criminals? That's not their status under existing international law. Their actual status would be that of spies and saboteurs, and therefore we can do with them as we see fit, up to and including summary execution.
Why is this so hard for people to remember? There is international case law that backs this up. > -----Original Message----- > From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2006 10:17 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Republicans Suspend Habeas Corpus > > > Nick wrote: > > How would you suggest we deal with people captured in a foriegn land > fighting the US Government? > > > > If it's a declared war between nations they're entitled to prisoner of > war status, Geneva Convention, Red Cross, Amnesty International, etc. > If it's not, they are to be treated as international criminals. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:217532 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
