> I wasn't neccessarily talking about the specific ammendment, but a > question in general. > > What is exceptable burning, and what is not? > Is it the burning that is unexceptable, or the message/speech behind > the burning. > > If it is the burning, then you need to look at other burnings > (funerals, scuttling a ship in time of war) > If is the speech, why is it not protected under free speech? What > makes this _particular_ speech so aggregious as to require a change > to > the constitution. Isn't there a lot of speech out there that is > worse? > >
What happens to clothing or items emblasoned with the US Flag, especially when they are discarded. It reminds me of the unintended consequences of most gay marriage amendments - they potentially forbid peple of the same gender entering into contracts with each other. Similarly if you break that US Flag mug you're holding, you could be arrested under the anti-flag burning amendments. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:217975 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
