> gMoney wrote: > When the number of dead American soldiers reaches 53,000 with no possible > successful outcome in sight, I MIGHT consider Iraq worse than Vietnam. >
For me the question is this: am I willing to put Loathe's life on the line for whatever it is that we're trying accomplish in Iraq? No. Therefore, to me, we're already at the line of too many Americans dead. Put another way: 3k in Iraq = 53k in Vietnam. I'm not willing as a voter to send even 1 more die, much less 50,000. So my point would be this: It taken 3000 dead to accomplish a greater failure in Iraq than the 53,000 it took in Vietnam. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:219003 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
