Rummy offered to resign twice in the past and Bush told him to stay. He should have just gone regardless of what Bush wanted, but that says to me that Rummy really wanted to stay before and the offers of resignation were just pro forma. Does that mean Bush fired him this time? Who knows.
On 11/8/06, Dana wrote: > > i can't imagine that the election had nothing to do with it. On the > other hand, if he were operating for the good of the party, he should > have done it weeks ago. For the good of the country, months ago. I > think he probably fell on his sword to make it look like Bush is > responsive > > -- --------------- Robert Munn www.funkymojo.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:220163 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
