read your own comments.you are still assuming that the dems have a plan that doesn't suck. they didn't have to run on a plan to win. does that mean they have some secret killer plan that they withheld from the public in order to win votes in congress at the cost of american lives in iraq? i certainly hope not.
On 11/8/06, Gruss wrote: > > > RoMunn wrote: > > You are putting way too much faith in a Democratic Party that has been > > totally devoid of real ideas in this arena for years. > > THEY DIDN'T NEED TO RUN ON ANYTHING! > > Let me restate that for clarity: The President's policy sucked so bad > that between the choice of the anything else and the Republicans, the > country picked anything else. > > When your opponent is beating the crap out of himself, let him! > > The Democrats will run behind the Baker-Hamilton plan which, > SURPRISE!! calls BOB GATES a member! Does that name sound familiar? > He's SecDef nominee! > > Read the fecking leaves, dude! The Democrats have teed this one up > perfectly. They're going to look, at a minimum, bi-partisan. Here > are the possibilities: > > 1.) Baker-Hamilton works. The Dems pushed out Rummy, pushed in Gates, > and got things back on track in a bi-partisan way. > > 2.) Baker-Hamilton fails. Well, EVERYBODY thought it was the right > thing to do. Including the President. > > Beautiful. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:220178 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
