On 12/22/06, So Kenfused <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nice post Sam.
Thanks > However, it appears to me we have failed getting our number 1 target (bin > Laden). Then opened up a second very questionable front. Would we not have > done better going after known terrorists and terrorist organizations? Rather > than invading a soveriegn nation. I'm no expert on Afghanistan but what I've read is much of the border is no-mans land not controlled by Afghanistan or Pakistan. The only option is to ask the tribal leader's nicely for there help or nuke portions of the border. We've asked nicely and received some help but not enough. Bin Laden being holed up there is probably worse then the cushy prison we would put him in before executing him. > Sadam attacked Kuwait in 1991. That war ended in 1992... Under conditions that were violated, invalidating the cease-fire. > Sadam did no more to support terrorism than many other countries in the > region (Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Syria, Lebanon, etc..) Saddam was the only one that praised the attacks of September 11th. The governments of the countries you've mentioned don't directly supporting terrorism while Iraq did. They flaunted the fact that they paid millions to suicide murders even after we told them terrorism will not be tolerated. He was involved with terrorism and many new documents coming out are proving it. > I've made this argument since before we attacked Iraq. I've yet to get a > good answer. You have, you just ignore it. :) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Create robust enterprise, web RIAs. Upgrade & integrate Adobe Coldfusion MX7 with Flex 2 http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:223160 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
