How exactly has Bush helped the strength and security of this country? Are we stonger and safer than we were on 9/11. I don't think so, and all of my friends and relatives "in uniform" don't think so either.
A "liberal" in office does not mean the end of the military. And not all Democrats are "liberals". As a matter of fact, the Congress has much more say in the funding, makeup and readiness of the forces than does the president. It was the Democratic Congress in the 80s that supported the restoration of the military. It was the Republican Conress since 1994 that reduced funding for troop strength, training, reequipment, and human intelligence. History at the moment seems to refute your beliefs. And also remember, the real reason the Democrats have a whisper of a chance at all is that Bush has scored less that a D in every category as President, especially in the "truthiness" category. This is according to the American people. Now, I admit, many Democrats scare me on Defense, but there are some that don't. And there are many Republicans that scare me on everything, including Defense. On 1/6/07, Bruce Sorge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I just pray this is over > before the next election and the US makes a huge mistake in voting a > liberal > as President. Say goodbye to national security and the strength of the US > military, because like Clinton they will demoralize our military and turn > it > in to another hollow military like it was in the 70's and the 90's. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Create robust enterprise, web RIAs. Upgrade & integrate Adobe Coldfusion MX7 with Flex 2 http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:223878 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
