One says the privelage shall not be suspended unless... Meaning if it is created by the courts it can only be suspended when...
The other says you may make no laws prohibiting the free exercise thereof... So free speech cannot be illegal. On 1/26/07, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just explaining as with most constitutional law, it's never clear cut. > > This list is only arguing Specters side when clearly Gonzalez's side > > is just as valid an argument. > > > so then would you give up your non-explicitly granted right to free > speech as well? > > Further, would you argue that Gonzales was right or arguably right if > he said there's no explicitly granted right to Freedom of Speach using > the same logic? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:225867 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
