> Dana wrote:
> I admire him for saying it.
>

His points were 4 fold:

1.) There was no frontdoor plan.  "If our occupation encounters
resistance how do we deal with it?"

2.) There was no backdoor plan.  "If our occupation fails, how do we get out?"

3.) It's unamerican to say that we can't or shouldn't debate military
policy and doing so fails our soldiers, our citizens, and our country.

4.) The President should not just send 20,000 people into a grinder
because he feels like it.  There should be unanimous agreement at this
point that that's the right thing to do.  If there isn't, then it's
probably not the right thing to do.

And the guy saying it still has shrapnel in him from Vietnam.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs 
http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:226043
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to