Tom did make the following good points:
If you really need your PC to finish huge encoding, transcoding or rendering
workloads within a defined time frame, yes, it is. Don't do it; stay with
XP. But as long as you don't need to finish workloads in record time, we
believe it makes sense to consider these three bullet points:
* Vista runs considerably more services and thus has to spend somewhat
more resources on itself. Indexing, connectivity and usability don't come
for free.
* There is a lot of CPU performance available today! We've got really
fast dual core processors, and even faster quad cores will hit the market by
the middle of the year. Even though you will lose application performance by
upgrading to Vista, today's hardware is much faster than yesterday's, and
tomorrow's processors will clearly leap even further ahead.
* No new Windows release has been able to offer more application
performance than its predecessor.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vivec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 9:32 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: The Anti-Windows crowd
>
> Have you read the review article in the links?
>
> On 2/5/07, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't have a high end system and I'm not complaining. My apps run
> the same
> > as they did under XP.
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs
http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:226828
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
