Because nothing else she could possibly say after that would matter. How about "I want to take those profits and share them with everyone in the US?"
Would that be good? On 2/6/07, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "The other day the oil companies reported the highest profits in the > > history of the world. I want to take those profits..." > > While I don't think that the nationalization of an industry is what > Clinton was truly advocating with her statement, why didn't you > include the part where she goes on to say, "... and put them into an > alternative energy fund that will begin to fund alternative smart > energy alternatives that will actually begin to move us toward the > direction of independence." > > Perhaps because it doesn't support the "Hillary's Dark Agenda" mold if > one includes the what or the why? > > Now, that said, I think that she definitely goofed and said the "I > want to take those profits" bit wrong; perhaps if she had said > something like "[I think it'd be a good idea for the energy industry > (oil, etc) to put a portion of those profits into an] alternative > energy fund that will begin to fund alternative smart energy > alternatives that will actually begin to move us toward the direction > of independence." > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:227109 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
