On 2/7/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2/6/07, Denstizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If you watch Fox News you saw it. The Right was quick to bash those > > who opposed, and you know it. And nobody said anything (how I felt). > > Why is it you can never back up anything you say? Come on, one link > can't be that hard.
This one's funny: http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/22/bush-stay-the-course/ Nothing about calling Decorated War Vets cowards, or whatnot, but, well, you know. More here: http://www.bushlies.net/ =] > And a sexual case was far more important than [fill in the blank]. > > Or at least interesting. Entertaining? eh. Y'all can do whatever you > > want, you know, that's fine, but at least try to have a sense of > proportion. > > Should we ignore all the women that complain about sexual abuse? Why > are you comparing Clintons abuses of power to these made up charges > anyway? Well, I don't think you or I know the facts. It's sorta impossible. IE What really happened. But yes, Bush2's lies are more damaging to the country than Clinton's Sex Scandal, by leaps and bounds. Why aren't you upset at bush for lying, power grabbing, running us into debt? Are you really still that attached to Clinton? > I do. There's a reason we want things to be as "transparent" as possible, > > You're making up things to be paranoid about, it's sad. I wish I were making it up. Do you favor transparency? > Ah. At that "higher level"-- I git cha. > > That's too stupid a comment to respond to. Ok. > There was a nifty PBS show about memory on the other night. > > Did you know people can implant "false" memories into others? > > What are you smoking :) It's True! Ask Alan Alda! > Dude, we radically shifted our power structure when Bush2 took office. > > All manner of things changed, the least of which was how close we > > were with China, etc. I wonder what it would've been like had Gore won. > > You mean because he's tight with the Buddhists and his admin sold them > satellite technology? Yup. Basically. They owed us. =p > one merely failed to add(or subtract) the jobs he'd lost, 2.5 mil or > > whatever. > > Don't forget the 10 million added to the workforce that mostly have jobs. What? The quote was about him "forgetting". > I saw him say basically the same thing on live t.v.. > > That doesn't work in a debate. Nice try. What? Do you not watch him talk, at least every once in a while? Are you refuting that he thinks he's got a right to spy on his people? Or just that bald faced lying isn't debatable? ;] > My point is he thinks > > Now you read minds, that explains everything. Yes. Perhaps it does. > Perhaps you can tell me if it was Saudi Arabia or Iraq that had the closer > > ties with the terrorists who actually attacked us? > > Do you think we should attack every country that has a citizen commit > a crime here? Those people weren't acting for the Saudi Government. > Saddam order his men to shoot down the American and British Jets. He > also paid terrorist reward money. But they were working for the Government of Iraq? That is why we attacked them, right? I mean, more than normal, with the fly zones and whatnot. Why was Saddam more of a threat than anyone else, Sam? > It's easier. Too easy as it was. Now it's insane. > > It isn't easier. You seem to think anyone working for the government > can set up a tap at will just for shits and giggles. Yes, it is easier. Have you been paying attention to this great freaking country? THAT IS THE WHOLE ISSUE! It's been getting easier by the year, but NEVER LIKE THIS! Dude, you should be a staunch supporter of privacy and liberty, main! I don't get it. *Must concentrate harder* nannooo nannooo, etc. > On it's own? I don't know, it seems to keep reoccurring. Let's hope we > > don't start throwing people in concentration camps. > > WTF? Too much "24". Sorry. That could never, and has never, happened here. Damn slave to tv too. Or is that Hollywood? Seems like tv isn't so much the back stage no more, eh? Anyone like "in case of emergency"? NB show. > Seriously, you don't > > see what's "bad" about not having privacy? > > I have my privacy, if you think you don't you are misled. And you believe this why? Just ignore the news, perhaps? Didn't know what we had in the way of "privacy" before? Bone up on America, and why we rock, and perhaps you'll see the light. > Just a reference to the government spying on everyone they can. > > You mean like in the Clinton days? I think that program expired. Yeah, like Bush2 expired the "BasketBall" stuff and whatnot. Oh, wait. Wasn't there just an inquiry into him not "expiring" it? > That's almost precisely what HAS gone away, Sam. That's a pig part of > what > > I'm bitching about. =-) > > You need to read about program and stay away from left-wing blogs. Program? The Program? Or programming? I don't see the correlation. =] > See, I bet those were all "bad" republicans. Probably threatened him. > > That's it. I knew it! > Which brings up an interesting point-- how many hops can they legally > take? > > Is it spelled out anywhere? Where is the oversight? Got Data? > > > > My point being, I really don't want people (even decent, god fearing > people) > > to be able to do a "google" through my personal stuff. And if someone > who > > called someone who called someone makes me fair game... that's weak. > > Easy fix: unsubscribe from all email groups. Maybe you should even > unplug your computer. Ah yea, but when they came for me I was like "weren't you gonna go after all those other folks first? Shucks. Now I'm screwed, cuz I'm alone". Or don't you follow history? > If *I* put it out there, like with this list n' google, so be it. My > > problem is with > > the spying on ourselves and ease of it. When you need so many "taps" > that > > even time travel isn't "good enough", there is a problem, Sam! > > Are you watching the sci-fi channel again? Re: even when they only had to ask permission after a tap had been performed. Vis a vee-- time travel. Even without a limit, they needed less of a limit. Give me a break. Break me off a piece of that kit-kat bar. This stuff is evil Sam. You know this, main! > I don't think so. And how do you cut taxes and increase spending? > > Well, I mean... I've seen how it's done. > > Because of the tax cuts, the tax revenue is the highest it's ever been. > I think the deficit is 1% of the GDP, the lowest it has ever been. > It's what happens when the economy is working. So, we're climbing outta debt already, eh? Sweet! I remember when I started seeing that happen with Clinton. Amazing stuff to see in action. We are climbing OUT of debt, right? That is what you meant? > Doesn't mean we shouldn't be able to negotiate prices. > > Who says we don't? Or do you want the man to set the price like in > socialized nations. I thought taht's what the hubbub was about. Guess move-on got it wrong, and there was no preferential treatment fer the pharmasooticals. Oh, wait, that's part of this whole platform, neh? "Look at what the Reds did with prescriptions?" Bah. The system needs some work. You should join us, Sam, and we can make things better. Or do you not really think the Status Quo is rock'n? > > stereotype. As for Aids research, who gave the most money? > > I don't know, who? > > Bush - $15 billion Sad that religion got in the way then. Really sad. What a waste of money- Well, not utilized as mucha s it coulda been... > Nonsense. Patent nonsense. Documented Nonsense! It was the WH > > that kept fuxing up. Obviously. Thus, the "16 words" or whatnot. > > Load of bull, might I add. =] > > Wilson lied, all the rest was fact. Oh, sure. Check out some of those links (it's only fair, I did check out yours). Then tell me it's all "fact". Or better yet, think about it for yourself. > But when he started to comply, it wasn't good enough, fast enough, > > or whatever. In a 13 year span, how does that work? > > Every time he changed his mind and didn't cooperate, until the ships > arrived, then he really meant what he said. Right ;) So, just how much of those attacks that were posted (the big list of attacks against us posted a bit ago) were perpetrated by Iraq-ees? Are you a whole person, Sam? You seem sorta ghosty? =]3 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:227288 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
