On 2/7/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2/7/07, Denstizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This one's funny:
> > http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/22/bush-stay-the-course/
>
> I'll give you a little fib on that but really, you really think that's an
> issue?


Naw.  Come on.  The dude said "stay-the-course-george", which was
in reference to the "I don't listen to my people" label he got, and the
"do nothing" label you referred to.  He's saying he was never so block
headed as to mean he's doing it his way and that's it.  My way or the
highway.  It's just random chance that he came off looking like that.

It's more "exciting" if you leave off the end part.  "Never said stay the
course" doesn't ring like "Never was ""stay the course george"".". =]

But a half alive sdf would know spin when it saw it, which makes me
wonder about your corporeal self, and whatnot.  =]

> Nothing about calling Decorated War Vets cowards, or whatnot, but,
>
> Exactly my point!


So, when I bring the data about remote viewing, and ESP and whatnot,
you'll believe me, as there's hard info?  I'm trying to win your heart, Sam,
as your mind is either someone else's, or overtaxed with the burden of
keeping all the cognitive disarray, disarrayed.  Er. Dissonant, even.  =]

> well, you know. More here: http://www.bushlies.net/ =]
>
> I couldn't find anything real there. It was a pack of lies about Bush
> lies.


LOL!  Well, I don't know who you'd believe, Sam.  I mean, if your own
filters don't kick this back at ya, there isn't much hope.  *sniff*
Can't you tell when you're being snowed?  Iraq and terrorists is Bush2's
thing, not America's.  If it were up to us, they'd all be wearing blue jeans
and drinking coke while bitching about their crappy government trying
to do what governments do.  Or whatever.  We'd sell them stuff. (maybe
give it for free for a bit, just to get them hooked and forgetting about
blow'n
demselves up and whatnot).  Dump some freaking bread on their asses.

> But yes, Bush2's lies are more damaging to the country than Clinton's
> > Sex Scandal, by leaps and bounds.
>
> Because he said stay the course? Explain.


Because he's doing what Gruss said, and what the historians are saying-
trying to consolidate the presidency.  There is a reason watergate happened,
and there is a reason why we put the stuff in place that we did.
But we're "safer" again, now that it's outta the way. Power, I need more
Power!
(and I'm going to take it, and tell you it's ok cuz *I* said so)

> Why aren't you upset at bush for lying, power grabbing, running us
> > into debt?  Are you really still that attached to Clinton?
>
> Again, you have him saying stay the course? The President doesn't need
> to grab for power, he has it :)


See, I new you were with us!  Bastard needs to give it back.  And we need
to make him.  All Good Americans should want that power for themselves.

> It's True!  Ask Alan Alda!
>
> No, to think that Jeffrey Dahmer or Colin Ferguson (LIRR shooter) had
> implanted memories.


Well, have you seen the Matrix?  Reality is an interesting thing, my friend.
Interesting and fun and horrible at times.  It is what it is.

Did you see Jeffrey Dahmer eat someone or Ferguson shoot someone?
Who has to tell you they did something for you to believe it?  Let me know,
and I'll see what I can do about the rest.  ;-)

> What?  The quote was about him "forgetting".
>
> I'm Lost.


You said something about "dont forget", avoiding the fact that that was
the whole "lie", the fact that he didn't add the minus, so to speak.

Weak lie, all presidents do it, blah blah, what I'm concerned about is
that you think it's ok for one person to be so powerful.  Or even a small
group of people.  It's scary, Sam!  Why do you trust soooooo much?

> What?  Do you not watch him talk, at least every once in a while?
> > Are you refuting that he thinks he's got a right to spy on his people?
> > Or just that bald faced lying isn't debatable?  ;]
>
> Saying "I saw him say basically the same thing " means nothing in a
> debate.


Why not?  It's the spirit, not the actual words.  As you must watch all his
speeches, you must have seen it.  And surely you're not proposing that he
hasn't said anything about how it's "ok" for him to listen to domestic
calls?
How he needed the "extra" (and it was extra, Sam) power to keep us "safe"?
He didn't ask right.  :-P

> Yes, it is easier.  Have you been paying attention to this great freaking
> > country?  THAT IS THE WHOLE ISSUE!  It's been getting easier by
> > the year, but NEVER LIKE THIS!  Dude, you should be a staunch
>
> Never? http://www.nationalreview.com/york/york200512200946.asp


Yes, Never like this.  NEVER Sam NEVER.  I know, cuz I read minds. Er. And
time travel. *cough

> Program?  The Program?  Or programming?  I don't see the correlation. =]
>
> This program:
> http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/01/20060122.html


Dude, you're sighting the very people who have a vested interest in this!
Why don't you give me a link from some "unbiased" legal type place?
I would be more likely to believe that information.
The WH has already proven it's lack of "truthyness", and lack of wanting
to let the American People know what's going on.  Grosses me out!

> So, we're climbing outta debt already, eh?  Sweet!  I remember when
> > I started seeing that happen with Clinton.  Amazing stuff to see in
> action.
>
> No, SS and Medicare are still going to get us. When Clinton took the
> SS money, he based it on ten future years of great economy. I see Bush
> has a new budget assuming the economy will do well until 2012. Same
> crap different spokesperson.


Indeed.  I'm not some Clintonite, Sam.  Why are you so pro-TakeOurPower?

Join the Reds? No thanks.


But it's beautiful over here!  Check otu the grass! *wink*Dave's not here
man*wink*

> Sad that religion got in the way then.  Really sad.  What a waste
> > of money-  Well, not utilized as mucha s it coulda been...
>
> Let me guess, Bush spent $15 billion on the abstinence message?


Naw, just let 100 tho or so folks die because he left out a couple of the
letters in the whole ABCs of prevention. Kids, wemon.  Weemon.  Womans.
Yeah, but since it wasn't "on purpose", it's kool, I remember. =]

> Oh, sure.  Check out some of those links (it's only fair, I did check out
> > yours).  Then tell me it's all "fact".  Or better yet, think about it
> for
> > yourself.
>
> Did you here the latest? Plame sent an email about sending hubby to
> Niger the day before Cheney asked to send someone. The more Fitz digs
> the worse you all look.
> Oh, and Wilson confirmed the yellowcake story to the CIA, the opposite
> of what he said publicly.


Sources? [reputable would be nice, as well]
Nothing smells fishy there, Sam! Sike.

> So, just how much of those attacks that were posted (the big list of
> > attacks against us posted a bit ago) were perpetrated by Iraq-ees?
>
> Did you hear about the elections? Purple fingers and all that?
>
> > Are you a whole person, Sam?  You seem sorta ghosty?
>
> Boo


Aaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!  I see d^Hrea^Hd people!  ;-)


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs 
http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:227327
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to