we all already know that Bush thinks that *everything* is a reasonable exercise of Presidential authority. Can you prove he is right without citing his own position paper?
that's my question > reasonable exercise of Presidential authority.(10) And indeed, in a > recent decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the District > of Columbia Circuit, Federal Election Comm'n v. NRA Political Victory > Fund, supra, the court cited to and relied upon a Presidential signing > statement that had declared that a Congressionally-enacted limitation > on the President's constitutional authority to appoint officers of the > United States was without legal force or effect. Id. at * 11. > > ..... > > On 2/8/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > and your link proves this???? > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:227435 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
