On 2/10/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Denstahr wrote:
> > If you don't see what's wrong with Bush2 having 100 times + the
> > amount of signing statements of any president prior, you really
> > do have your head in the sand.
>
> But the question isn't *should he* the question is legally *can he*.
> The answer is yes.  But at least you and I agree that he shouldn't.

If law were final, perhaps.  Some fixed thing. Vs. Interpreted, and
re-interpreted, etc..

Is there a statute  of limitations on trying to wreck the country?

Hehe.  Just kidding, yeah, we agree, he shouldn't.  [=

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs 
http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:227717
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to