I did not mean that it's antiquated because "everyone is doing it."  I'm not that 
shallow.  What I mean is that it is a law that was
made before separation of church and state.  It is a law founded on morals dictated by 
religion and should, therefore, not be an
enforceable law.  Although I don't morally feel that adultery is OK I do feel that 
adultery is not something that can be lawfully
wrong.

Howie

----- Original Message -----
From: "C. Hatton Humphrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 1:38 PM
Subject: RE: How to lie your way into the White House - Bush-style


> That is an particularly horrible standard to hold.
>
> If you should not do something because it is wrong (morally, ethically,
> religiously, medically), but everyone is doing it, is it still wrong?
>
> Don't get me wrong, there are laws that "aren't enforced" (in my area it's
> the speed limit) and some that just plain need to be taken off the books
> because they are outdated.  I'll agree to that, but even with that being
> said, my personal morals (and the Christian ethics that Mr. Clinton claimed
> to espouse) both define Adultery as a sin.
>
> Hatton
>
______________________________________________________________________
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to