CAVEAT: Not directed at Todd or Beth. This just happened to be the e-mail that I hit reply to.
Some of the comments made in support of Clinton reminds me of a political cartoon that I saw at the height of all of that BS. It was a fish with a hook in it's mouth and the fish had the words "American People" written on the side, and Clinton holding the pole. Michael Corrigan Programmer Endora Digital Solutions 1900 Highland Avenue, Suite 200 Lombard, IL 60148 630-627-5055 ext.-136 630/627-5255 Fax ----- Original Message ----- From: Todd To: CF-Community Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 1:26 PM Subject: Re: How to lie your way into the White House - Bush-style Do I need to get an interpreter for you two so you can understand each other? hehe Todd ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Corrigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:18 PM Subject: Re: How to lie your way into the White House - Bush-style > Right, allegedly. So are you saying that because it was Bill Clinton, > that the sexual harassment charges filed against him not be > investigated? Last I heard, sexual harassment is against the law. > > Michael Corrigan > Programmer > Endora Digital Solutions > 1900 Highland Avenue, Suite 200 > Lombard, IL 60148 > 630-627-5055 ext.-136 > 630/627-5255 Fax > ----- Original Message ----- > From: BethF > To: CF-Community > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 1:18 PM > Subject: Re: How to lie your way into the White House - Bush-style > > > > What if they felt that they should be able to have sex with anyone > they > > wanted whether the other person wanted them to or not? Is that ok? > Of > > course the answer is no. > > The answer is NO for the other person - not for me. Its an issue of > personal morality, not of legality. What bearing does this have on > Clinton? Do you know that hillary had a problem with his boffing > Monica? > > > The investigations started because Clinton > > allegedly sexually assaulted another woman. > > Allegedly being the key word. > > > > Michael Corrigan > > Programmer > > Endora Digital Solutions > > 1900 Highland Avenue, Suite 200 > > Lombard, IL 60148 > > 630-627-5055 ext.-136 > > 630/627-5255 Fax > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: BethF > > To: CF-Community > > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 12:49 PM > > Subject: Re: How to lie your way into the White House - Bush-style > > > > > > Since I don't believe in "sin" this doesn't matter to me. > > For me, and in my relationships, adultery would be wrong. > > > > But i have some friends who decided they could never be happy in > > monogamy > > and have an open marriage. It works for them and they are HAPPY. > > Quite > > frankly, I cant' understand it, nor would I ever be able to accept > it > > in my > > own relationships however, who the heck am I to say its "wrong". > It > > doesnt' hurt anyone. If they got off on having sex with kids or > > animals, i > > would feel differently but if they want to have a non-monogamous > > marriage > > its really not anyone elses business. > > > > We dont know what the agreement is in Bill and Hillary's marriage. > > Perhaps > > she would prefer someone else sleep with him. > > > > > > > > --Beth, Pseudo usenet cop > > Merlin MTB, BikeE AT, RANS gliss, Trek R200, Kickbike > > Owned by Kavik (Samoyed Boy) and Toklat (Keeshond Boy) > > Anchorage, Alaska > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "C. Hatton Humphrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 9:38 AM > > Subject: RE: How to lie your way into the White House - Bush-style > > > > > > > That is an particularly horrible standard to hold. > > > > > > If you should not do something because it is wrong (morally, > > ethically, > > > religiously, medically), but everyone is doing it, is it still > > wrong? > > > > > > Don't get me wrong, there are laws that "aren't enforced" (in my > > area it's > > > the speed limit) and some that just plain need to be taken off > the > > books > > > because they are outdated. I'll agree to that, but even with > that > > being > > > said, my personal morals (and the Christian ethics that Mr. > Clinton > > claimed > > > to espouse) both define Adultery as a sin. > > > > > > Hatton > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 1:30 PM > > > > To: CF-Community > > > > Subject: Re: How to lie your way into the White House - > Bush-style > > > > > > > > > > > > Half of Washington DC would be incarcerated if that was > enforced. > > > > Seems a bit antiquated, no? > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Jon Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 1:19 PM > > > > Subject: Re: How to lie your way into the White House - > Bush-style > > > > > > > > > > > > > In Washington, DC, adultery is a crime, punishable by six > > > > months in jail and > > > > > a $500 fine. > > > > > > > > > > jon ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
