it's a defective product that is known to cause thousands of deaths. Still ok with you?
>On 3/23/07, Dana Tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> There is no question that product development efforts on "nicotine >> delivery" focused on making cigarette *more* addictive, not on reducing >> harm, and that marketing efforts were geared to finding replacement smokers >> amongst women, minorities and young people. >> > >Replacement smokers among women and minorities? Fine. What's the problem? >You have a product, you need a market, you go for it. > >Young people, that's where I agree with you. That would be an illegal >practice worthy of a lawsuit. > >I don't really care if they researched how to make cigarettes more >addictive. Unless I'm mistaken, manufacturing an addictive product is not >against the law. > >-- >She's a PhD in "I told you so" >You've a knighthood in "I'm not listening" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Create robust enterprise, web RIAs. Upgrade & integrate Adobe Coldfusion MX7 with Flex 2 http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=RVJP Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:231226 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
