in both cases, someone said something that could be construed as
inflammatory.  personally, I find Isaiah's comemnts much more inflammatory
than Imus'

The comments Imus made were not made about a black women's basketball team,
rather a women's basketball team, not all the players are black.

Then sponsors pulled their ads after Sharpton and Jackson made an issue of
it and started threatening to boycott (which I don't think would ever work
anyway).  CBS, NBC and all the sponsors bowed down to what could be
construed as terroristic threats.

In America, I expect that everyone, within the decency guidelines in place,
can speak their minds without fear of retribution.

I have seen  opinion polls on whether readers think Imus should have lost
his job.  In everyone, the majority of respondents said he should not have.

On 4/16/07, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> How is it a double standard?
>
> The gay community are the ones that needed to speak out about that issue
> if
> they felt it was warranted under the circumstances. They pursued it,
> Isaiah
> denied making the statements, he did not do so on nationally syndicated
> talk
> radio, it was ALLEGED comments made on the set. Not out in public.So the
> two
> cannot be compared, no matter how hard you try to stretch things.
>
> The only comparable situation would be if a black, nationally syndicated
> talk show host did the same thing to a white women's basketball team.
> Has this occurred?
> I raised this point before and received no response.
>
> There are SEVERAL sponsors pulling their advertisements and sponsorship
> from
> the Imus show in protest. They started doing so as soon as the story
> broke,
> not weeks later. Are all these companies run by black people? CBS's own
> Staff apparently felt offended and they too complained and CBS stated that
> this was the reason, more than any other, for the move to take Imus off
> the
> air.
> Are they all black?
>
> People generally were upset by the comments.
> Are you going to say they had no right to be upset?
> Or if they are upset at this they are supposed to be upset to the same
> degree at every other incident?
> Where's the double standard?
>
> In America is it ok for someone to do something repeatedly and each time
> they say sorry and that makes it ok?
> Sure you can forgive, but that doesn't absolve the person from facing the
> penalties if any for the action in the first place.
> Imus was wrong. He apologized, some forgave him...but that does not mean
> he
> does not have to pay the penalties, if any, for his actions.
>
>
> On 4/16/07, Scott Stroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > And what of Isaiah Washington, the black actor who referred to
> homosexuals
> > as 'faggots'?  Why is that OK?  Why didn't the Reverends Sharpton and
> > Jackson condemn him and demand his job? Why wasn't the black community
> > rallied to boycott ABC and the sponsors of 'Grey's Anatomy'.  Was it
> > because
> > the slur was not aimed at blacks, or because a black man uttered it?
> >
> > Its a double standard. And that is was infuriates me about this issue.
> >
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Create Web Applications With ColdFusion MX7 & Flex 2. 
Build powerful, scalable RIAs. Free Trial
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=RVJS 

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:232646
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to