Of course not, but it doesn't mean you should throw it out at every new theory that comes along.
If somebody comes up to you and tells you the world is round, when you've been told all your life that it is flat, you need more than just his word or scientific jargon. You need something that the common man can see, something he can understand and wrap his head around. A guy went and sailed to a new place and brought back people and things nobody had ever seen before. He went out and brought back the t-shirt as proof. The common man saw things that he was able to understand. You cannot expect non-scientific types to change their opinion based on something that looks like jargon. You have to have to have the t-shirt. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 9:51 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: 35% of Democrats > > Longevity makes validity? Slavery was accepted for millennia maybe we > should reconsider? Pagan believes stood for millennia. Then there is > Christianity vs. Islam vs. Hinduism, vs. Buddhism all these seem to > have > an extended history is the oldest one the one that is correct? I'm > sorry the world was flat for millenia, maybe we should reconsider this > new sphere concept is not nearly old enough to be valid. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Deploy Web Applications Quickly across the enterprise with ColdFusion MX7 & Flex 2 Free Trial http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=RVJU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:234089 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
